96 Normat 53:2, 96 (2005)
Summary in English
Erik M. Alfsen, Karl Egil Aubert
1924–1990 (Norwegian).
A brief biography of the Norwegian al-
gebraist Karl Egil Aubert.
Ue Thomas Jankvist and Nesli-
han Saßlanmak, What did they seek
and what did they find? Combinatoric
solutions for algebraic equations from
Cardano to Cauchy Part 1 (Danish).
A history of algebraic equation solving
before Gauss, Abel and Galois, more
specifically in the period from 1545
to 1815. In this first part of the ar-
ticle the authors present the methods
of Cardano, Viète, Tschirnhaus, Waring
and Vandermonde, but also discuss con-
tributions from Ferrari, Girard, Euler
and Bézout. The article foc uses on the
use of combinatorics, permutations and
invariance considerations in algebraic
equation s olving. Some of the points
made in Part 1 concern the influence of
alchymistic thoughts in these methods.
Also the authors argue that the period
from 1546 to 1770 is not as ‘blunt’ as it
might seem at first glance.
Ståle Gundersen, Does it follow from
del’s incompleteness theorems that
we are not machines? (Norwegian).
The Austrian logician Kurt del
proved the two incompleteness theo-
rems in 1931. The first of these states
that within each mathematical formal
system there exists a true sentence (the
del sentence) that cannot be proven
within the formal system. The second
states that the consistency of a formal
system cannot be proven by the system
itself. Since computers are machines
which can instantiate formal systems,
the philosopher J. R. Lucas and the
physicist and mathematician R. Penrose
have argued that del’s two incom-
pleteness theorems imply that human
beings cannot be machines (computers).
According to their argument, we are not
machines be cause we know we can be
consistent, but unlike the machines we
can also prove that the Gödel sentence
is true. The author presents the Lucas/
Penrose argument and rejec ts it as in-
valid.
Johan Häggström, The concept of
function in historical light (Swedish).
In spite of being one of the most impor-
tant mathematical concepts, the con-
cept of function can be, and has been,
described and defined in many ways.
The article exposes the diversity by
showing examples from textbooks and
by a brief journey through the history
of function. Three aspects of the devel-
opment are highlighted.