48 Normat 56:1, 48 (2008)
Summary in English
Nils Baas and Christian Skau, Sel-
bergintervjuet I - Matematisk Oppvext
(Norwegian).
This is part one of four of an inter-
view with Atle Selberg (1917-2007) con-
ducted a couple of months before he
died. It treats his childhood and youth
up to his departure for the US after
the war. It is a mixture of private rem-
iniscences, mostly of interest to Nor-
wegians, and his mathematical awak-
ening. Selberg was the youngest child
in a family of five children, three of
which became professors of mathemat-
ics. His first recorded mathematical dis-
covery was that squares differed by the
odd numbers made at the age of seven
or so. At fifteen he discovered a con-
nection between the integral
R
1
0
dx
x
x
and
the series
P
∞
n=1
1
n
n
which was also pub-
lished as a note, incidentally in Nor-
mat (1933). Early on he encountered
the works of Ramanujam and his first
article (Über einige arithmetische Iden-
titäten) treated mock theta-functions
and was sent to Watson (of Whittaker
and W.) who, however, was very tardy.
For his preliminary work at the univer-
sity of Oslo in 1939 under Skolem he
considered modular forms represented
by Poincaré series. It turned out to be
extensive enough to have qualified as
a doctoral dissertation, but for that he
had other plans. But even before that
he had extended work on the partition
function done by Hardy and Ramanu-
jam only to discover that he had been
anticipated by Rademacher. It was a
big disappointment and he decided not
to publish it, although his results were
sharper.
He spent some time at Uppsala,
which had a better library than Oslo,
where he learned for the first time of the
hyperbolic plane. In fact his geometrical
education had been spotty, and he had
encountered the trigonometric functions
for the first time in his life in connection
with Eulers formulas! During the Ger-
man invasion of Norway he was drafted
into the military resistance, which, how-
ever, did not last long and permitted
him to return to mathematics, in which
he now started to focus on the Riemann
zetafunction. His improvement on the
estimates of Hardy and Littlewood were
so spectacular that when H. Bohr was
asked what had happened in European
mathematics during the war he simply
replied – Selberg.
Paul Papatzacos, Formler for π
fra femtenhundretallets Kerela (Norwe-
gian).
The Leibniz formula
π
4
= 1 −
1
3
+
1
5
−
1
7
. . . is of course well-known, and one of
the first infinite series for π which peo-
ple usually encounter. However, it was
known in India long before it was re-
discovered by Gregory and Leibniz. Its
convergence is very slow, but it can be
souped up by adding an appropriate rest
term, which was also known to the In-
dians in Kerala. How did they find it?
By trial and error, or maybe by contin-
ued fractions? The latter gives an ele-
gant, but maybe anachronistic explana-
tion. Rewampings of the series as
π
4
=
7
9
+ 36
P
∞
m=1
1
((n
3
−n)(n−1)
2
+5)((n+1)
2
+5)
with n = 2m + 1 were known to them
already in the 16th century.